<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Blog Comments Hurting Your Brand?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newmediareview.com/2009/12/are-blog-comments-hurting-your-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newmediareview.com/2009/12/are-blog-comments-hurting-your-brand/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Strategies and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://newmediareview.com/2009/12/are-blog-comments-hurting-your-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmediareview.com/?p=885#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Excellent point, Brad! Thanks for your comment and I couldn&#039;t agree more with your assessment: &quot;What a negative comment free-for-all represents is the fact that a brand’s product or service — for lack of a better word — sucks.&quot; If a brand can listen to its customers and change its product for the better, everybody wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point, Brad! Thanks for your comment and I couldn&#8217;t agree more with your assessment: &#8220;What a negative comment free-for-all represents is the fact that a brand’s product or service — for lack of a better word — sucks.&#8221; If a brand can listen to its customers and change its product for the better, everybody wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Schwarzenbach</title>
		<link>http://newmediareview.com/2009/12/are-blog-comments-hurting-your-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Schwarzenbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmediareview.com/?p=885#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

Really solid advice for brands. If I could add something...

This kind of situation can actually be a revenue generating/cost reducing opportunity for the brand, despite the sort of panic it can create.

What a negative comment free-for-all represents is the fact that a brand&#039;s product or service -- for lack of a better word -- sucks. So, to find oneself in this position represents an opportunity to make the product better. It&#039;s free product insight, a web-based focus group. It&#039;s certainly a bitter pill to swallow but it can, indeed, yield a better product. Which, if transparently created and executed, can turn public sentiment around and generate revenue.

Keep those tips coming! Brands need to be listening to this kind of valuable information because too often they don&#039;t get the &quot;digital mind.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>Really solid advice for brands. If I could add something&#8230;</p>
<p>This kind of situation can actually be a revenue generating/cost reducing opportunity for the brand, despite the sort of panic it can create.</p>
<p>What a negative comment free-for-all represents is the fact that a brand&#8217;s product or service &#8212; for lack of a better word &#8212; sucks. So, to find oneself in this position represents an opportunity to make the product better. It&#8217;s free product insight, a web-based focus group. It&#8217;s certainly a bitter pill to swallow but it can, indeed, yield a better product. Which, if transparently created and executed, can turn public sentiment around and generate revenue.</p>
<p>Keep those tips coming! Brands need to be listening to this kind of valuable information because too often they don&#8217;t get the &#8220;digital mind.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
